|
Krieger:
Attitude about altitude leaves Rockies
high and dry
March 27,
2004
TUCSON -
Despite the cheery taste of the Kool-Aid
- sort of a mango thing - I am sorry to
report the Rockies' latest plan has a
flaw about a mile high.
Meet the new flaw, same as the old
flaw.
If you've been doing the reading, you
know Rockies brass is working overtime
to make the case that operating on a
shoestring is actually a good thing. In
no time, they intend to be the Oakland
A's in pinstripes.Unfortunately, they
face an obstacle the A's don't, and
money is at the root of their failure to
deal with it.
GM Dan O'Dowd, the one club official
who once wanted to face it, now parrots
the convenient - and, I'm afraid,
patently ridiculous - position that it
is mostly a psychological problem.
In other areas, including personnel,
-O'Dowd has been brutally honest with
himself about past failings. But the
evidence suggests Rockies owners decided
not to address the altitude issue
because they didn't want to spend the
money, and now even O'Dowd is reasoning
in reverse to justify this decision.
It is bad enough that
Greeley's Cliff Neeley, an independent
entrepreneur, has to do the research for
them. It's as if the Rockies gave their
Rubik's Cube one look, shrugged and went
out for pizza.
Once the statistical anomalies became
apparent early on, the organization
should have devoted significant
resources to the atmospheric research
Neeley has done. It's the Rockies' dumb
luck that he did it without them. When
he proposed a solution, they took one
look at the price tag and walked away.
Neeley downsized his proposal, but
Rockies owners, facing a series of cash
calls, are not prepared to spend a dime.
So Neeley is now recruiting his own
investors to support a novel commercial
enterprise that might end up helping an
organization that won't help itself.
The facts are familiar:
Playing in the most hitter-friendly
venue in major league history, the Rocks
become accustomed to the conditions and
struggle elsewhere:
In 1999, they ranked first in hitting
at home (.325) and 28th on the road
(.248). Again in 2000, they ranked first
at home (.334) and 28th on the road
(.252). In 2001, they were first at home
(.331) and 25th on the road (.253). In
2002, they were first at home (.313) and
30th, or last, on the road (.234).
Unwilling to face the physics, the
Rockies announced the problem was
physiological - playing at altitude was
tiring them out. So last year, they made
a big deal of changing their workout
habits. The result?
They ranked second in hitting at home
(.294) and 30th on the road (.239).
No other franchise has such a
consistent, dramatic disparity.
Why? The science is elementary.
There's less air resistance a mile high
than at sea level. Pitches have less
movement. That makes hitting easier.
Hitters get used to those conditions,
and the first few pitchers on the road
look like Sandy Koufax.
The same science explains the
difference in lift characteristics for
aircraft at altitude. These are not
state secrets.
I suggested development of a
high-altitude baseball. The Rockies
chuckled.
Neeley suggested an enormous,
pressurized chamber in which hitters
could take batting practice in sea level
conditions so they would be prepared for
the road. The Rockies got sticker shock
and passed.
Neeley kept downsizing his
proposal to make it cheaper. He had a $6
million, two-station version that would
fit inside Coors Field. He offered to
lease it for a fraction of that. The
Rocks passed again. He's now raising
money for a single-station, $3 million
version, or one-quarter what Larry
Walker will make this season.
"I think that the altitude issue has
created a mind-set here, which has led
to an attitude problem here," O'Dowd
told me last week. "It's this beast
that's over us constantly, and we look
at it as an obstacle, rather than
looking at it for what it is."
Which is?
"Mentally, if you allow it, it's
going to cause you problems."
So you don't believe it's an
actual, physical effect?
"I do, and you know that I do because
I've already come out publicly and
talked about it, but I'm beginning to
believe that that effect is as much
mental as anything. I think it's as much
mental as it is physical, and maybe
more."
Which, of course, means he doesn't
have to spend any money on it.
A high school science teacher can
show O'Dowd in 20 minutes why the same
pitch will move more in San Francisco
than in Denver. Each new roster O'Dowd
assembles has the same problem with that
transition.
That's not psychology or physiology.
That's physics. And embarrassingly
elementary physics at that.
The Rockies are just too cheap to
deal with it. There's your attitude
problem.
|