Denver Parade of Homes DisappointingAugust 28, 2005. The Denver version of the Parade of Homes is becoming more irrelevant every year, at least from the standpoint of being a showcase of new technology in the home. A few years ago, visitors would be assured of seeing some of the latest gadgets available for home use at the annual presentation of the state of the art in home building presented by the local building association.
No more.
This year's 20th anniversary show continues the trend toward grossly expensive, overdone mansions that have little relevance to anyone but people who want to spend large amounts of money for ostentatious, uninspired buildings in increasingly remote areas. On the plus side, they are almost always next to a golf course.
The current show is located at an area called "Pradera", which is located 6 or 7 miles northeast of Castle Rock, Colorado. Pradera, Spanish for "prairie", doesn't really live up to its name, being more of a valley surrounded by gently rolling hills covered with scraggly vegetation. It's not quite desert, but it's headed that way.
Nestled in the middle of Pradera, along the golf course, is the site of the Parade, seven sprawling homes, clustered loosely around a cul-de-sac. They range in price from 1.6 million dollars and up - way up. While walking through each home, I couldn't help but wonder what the designers and builders were thinking. The use of space was strange indeed, with some configurations that defied explanation. Obviously, this caters to the whims of the future owners, who must be confused indeed to flush a wad of cash on these disasters.
But enough about the mundane subjects of floor plans and home furnishings. I was there to see technology, and I must say there was precious little. In prior years, for example, most kitchens had mini-offices in them or nearby, which generally contained a networked computer. But apparently that fashion is no longer in vogue, because were no desks in the kitchens anymore. Espresso bars, yes. Desks, no. Not only that, but there were few, if any flat panel monitors, which were a big feature of last year's kitchens. Here's a rundown of my observations:
There were plenty of other areas where I would have expected people with money would have wanted to make use of the latest technology, but it wasn't there.
Remember Tomorrowland? They weren't even up to that standard from the 1957 Monsanto Home of the Future. There were no picture phones, no computerized temperature controls, virtually no technological innovations of any kind. These houses could have been built 25 years ago and had the same technology.
|
||